Great Resources from our Forward Leadership Community

Forward Leadership Community

Re-Cap: 
This is Broken: Technical and Adaptive Change


Perhaps the best thing to come out of our last seminar is a renewed focus on noticing; noticing the broken, the thriving, the complicated, the simple, the systemic,  and even the mundane. Noticing the way we've always done things and asking "why?" Noticing when we're afraid, anxious or uncomfortable and instead of hiding from it- naming it. Noticing when the quick fix isn't going to cut it and that there are deeper issues to address.

We like to refer to the Vital Signs report as the CAT scan because it makes you stand up and take notice.  We see under the surface to where those adaptive changes are needed in order to increase the health and vitality of the whole system- not just one or two parts. The temptation is that we try to tweak one or two things to effect adaptive change when really we need to question and re-evaluate the way the whole system operates. That will mean different things for each congregation and the path of change will be show itself in a variety of ways. Yet we as a community can learn from one another; the art of noticing is not a solitary activity. New and different perspectives widen our vision and, with God's help, we'll move from noticing, to questioning, to implementing change, and moving forward.


Resources:

This is Broken: Adaptive and Technical Change Power Point Slides
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0h6JObwjMQAcTFVdHBWRHNZVFk/view?usp=sharing

This is Broken Video
http://www.ted.com/talks/seth_godin_this_is_broken_1

SHIPIT Journal Audio
http://sethgodin.typepad.com/freeprize/2012/05/an-audio-introduction-to-the-shipit-journal.html


SHIPIT for Congregations
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0h6JObwjMQAdXp4eHpLMlAyS1k/view?usp=sharing

Technical Problems vs. Adaptive Challenges (Chart)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0h6JObwjMQAUzc5QURyYzUxZHc/view?usp=sharing

The Harvard Experiment- Adaptive Challenges (Article)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0h6JObwjMQAQmZ1SThZME9TQ2s/view?usp=sharing


DWM Smart Goals Workbook
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0h6JObwjMQANWVGY0xLZkl6VkU/view?usp=sharing

Leadership Zones: Emergent, Performative, Reactive (Article)
http://nextreformation.com/?p=2727

If you haven't already discovered it, David Lose has a wonderful blog called "In the Meantime..." Lots of different categories and thoughts, but you'll find some great articles about adaptive change and innovation under the heading of "Leadership". Here's a few to get you started:

 

Finally, after our conversations about shame  and dancing with fear someone mentioned that they were reminded of the TED talks on vulnerability and shame by Brene Brown.

Data vs Stories

The article below is from a recent issue of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, which is essentially THE journal of the Non-Profit world.  I include it here today as part of my efforts to help our congregations retool around stewardship.

Just last night, i was at Immanueal Lutheran in Meridan, CT for my Crazy Stewardship Consult.  Their Pastor Chris McKinstry is doing a bang up job at this congregaion, and he invited me.  During the course of the 103 minute session, I talked about the fact that budgets and spreadsheets don't motivate people to be generous stewards of God's gifts.  Yes, you need them to run an organization, and you need them to insure financial integrity and transparency.  But, don't hold them up on sunday morning as a motivator to get people to give.

Instead, tell stories about your ministry.  Tell is the third leg of the three leg stool ASK THANK TELL.  Buy Chalres Lane's book ASK THANK TELL - best thing out there in congregational stewardship.

TELL stories about your ministry, who you impacted and how you impacted their lives.  The following article elaborates on the value of telling your story.  How would you take this article and use it in a ministry setting?

3 Tips for Telling Stories That Move People to Action

COURTESY OF THE JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T. MACARTHUR FOUNDATION 
Heard any good social-change stories lately?

 

Did they move you to action? Did they make you think different about the meaning of justice?

“For purposes of advocacy, a story is only as good as the impact it has on how audiences understand an issue or get involved,” says Susan Nall Bales, the founder and executive director of the FrameWorks Institute, a research group that helps nonprofits communicate about social problems. “It’s an empirical question whether a story moves audiences to support policies or engage with an issue.” 

Ms. Bales’s team of cognitive and social scientists conducts research on how to frame stories about social issues and trains advocates to create change based on that research. Last month, the group won it a $1 million MacArthur Award for Creative and Effective Institutions.

Here are a few of the organization’s findings, which include some unconventional ideas.

Data are more powerful when woven into a story. 

The United States puts more people in prison than any other country. Black men have a 32-percent chance of spending time behind bars at some point in their lives compared to a 6-percent chance for white men. During 2010, 18 of every 1,000 men in the U.S. were in prison.

What does that tell you?

Depending on your beliefs, it might indicate that we put too many people in prison or that men commit lots of crimes or that our criminal-justice system is keeping us safe. It may tell you that black men are more than five times more criminal than white men or that our criminal-justice system has a racial bias.

The data alone don’t tell you anything.

Given only data, the audience is more likely to mold that information to fit their beliefs than allow it to change their minds.

But when you combine facts and values in a narrative, you’re more likely to change public opinion and policy.

That’s the conclusion of a 2013 FrameWorks Institute paper on “Framing and Facts” in criminal-justice issues.

“Advocates use a lot of numbers, expecting that those facts will lead to a breakthrough,” Ms. Bales says. “It’s by embedding the facts into a narrative that gives the data a value. And you need to test the data and the values to get the right story.”

Be careful when using vivid examples. 

How big a problem is homelessness? And what should we do about it?

Your view depends partly on the kinds of stories you hear.

If you hear a clinical case study of a man who is laid off, gets addicted to drugs, and loses his home, you might have one idea of how common homelessness is. But if you hear that same man’s story told with vivid details and a strong emotional appeal, you’re more likely to think the incidence of homelessness is higher.

Homeless advocates might take that to mean they should tell vivid stories to make their audience grasp the problem and take action. Not so fast, say the folks at FrameWorks. Yes, such stories increase the salience of the issue in the public’s mind, but there may be a cost.

A dramatic account of one homeless man’s experience may lead listeners to empathize with him, or it may also lead them to think his homelessness is his own fault rather than the result, in part, of bad housing policy and other problems in the economy.

This conundrum about personal stories also works the other way, says FrameWorks. If you highlight the story of a man who works his way out of homelessness, then you risk suggesting that anyone who works hard enough can do the same and that people who don’t succeed have themselves to blame.

Stories of exemplary individuals should be used only with caution. Before using such a story, FrameWorks says, ask yourself if it would be likely to distort the reality of your issue, to focus on individual rather than social responsibility, or to activate stereotypes in your audience.

Tell success stories about groups of people.

Let’s say the man crawls his way out of homelessness, perhaps with the help of a social-service organization. On the surface, it’s a perfectly nice success story.

But what is the audience likely to do with that story?

FrameWorks research says people might say, “Good for him!” and leave it at that.

That’s why the group recommends against telling “episodic” stories, or stories that zoom in on a particular individual or event. Instead, tell “thematic” stories, ones that zoom out to show a whole issue in context.

Episodic stories tend to de-politicize an issue, while thematic ones highlight the social and political nature of problems like homelessness. The notion of “episodic” and “thematic” frames was pioneered by Shanto Iyengar and Donald Kinder in their 1989 book News That Matters.

To help people understand social problems and inspire them to take action, you might tell another kind of success story. It’s one that tells of a community of people — homeless people, their advocates, neighbors, and local legislators — who work together to create sensible public policy to reduce homelessness. Such a story could include shared values that people can unite around; it may put the social problem in context; and it may show the importance of teamwork, so your audience feels capable of making a difference.

By telling success stories about collective triumph, you will prompt your audience to action rather than just sympathy.

To learn more, visit the FrameWorks new page of storytelling resources.

Spring Bishop on a Bike Tour

Join me as I visit every conference of the New England Synod this spring to present "The NeXt CHurch"

more info to come shortly at nesynod.org/2020

I am coming to your conference, and I'd like you to come and bring members of your congregation.

What will be the focus of this event? 

- A chance to orient assembly voting members to some key decisions we face as a synod.

- Our church and congregations are in the midst of change. How will we respond?

- We are all facing financials challenges.  What are new/old ways of addressing this matter?

- Younger generations seem to understand faith in ways that don't match our current patterns. Are there ways to connect with them? 

I plan to make a presentation on ways we in New England and in the whole of the ELCA need to move forward and plan for the Next Church.  

I do hope you will attend, and bring as many people as you wish from your congregation.

More info to come soon.

 

Nine Common Tensions Pastors Face

Thom Rainer writes a blog that I read.  Today, I came across this post, which resonates true in my experience.  Looking at this list, I realized why I sometimes had struggles in my two congregations with traditionally ministry oriented people in those congregations.  I tended to be on the outside ministry side of the scale.  What I mean is, look below at # 2, # 6 and # 9.  I spent over 50% of my time with non-members, and out in the community.  It paid off, cause over the years those people came to the churches I served.  But, all that time meant I gave less attention to visiting with the members.  That got me in trouble sometimes.  But we make choices in ministry.  #9 was equally tough.  I paid more attention to the decisions that had impact on the longer term ministry of the church.  I sacrificed the short term for the long term.  This was also hard for people in the churches, because we human beings are near term results oriented.

It strikes me that pastoral ministry is a tension between an inward focus and an outward focus.  The challenge for clergy is that the congregation pays the bills, and they benefit from an inward focus.  However, congregations that are inwardly focused have no future.  No one wants to join a mission whose job is to take care of itself.  The only people who want that, are the ones who are already in the group.  Pastors must push on this tendency, and resolve to pay enough attention to the inward nature of the congregation-- just enough to calm the tension from time to time. But, commit to the vision and practice of ministry in the community.  This tension is our greatest challenge today, because what we really need is externally focused congregations, and pastors who will lead them in a ministry of service.  

 

Nine Common Tensions Pastors Face

Every day, pastors and other church staff make intentional decisions about what is important in their lives and ministries. Often, the decisions they must make are between competing demands. These decision points are tensions in the lives of pastors and church staff. The directions they choose shape their ministries.

  1. Family time versus church time. Pastoral ministry is a 24/7 vocation. There is rarely real down time. Families often suffer because pastors and staff don’t know how to say “no” to the expectations of the church.
  2. Office time versus time in the community. Church members often expect pastors and staff to be in the office and available for their needs. But pastors also need to be out of the office connecting with people in the community.
  3. Being a people pleaser versus being a good steward. Well-intending church members often begin sentences with, “Pastor, we need to . . .” Those sentences are expectations members have on pastors and staff. The temptation for many of these leaders is to say “yes” to most of the requests. But saying “yes” to everything means you will do nothing well.
  4. Visiting for crisis needs versus visiting for commonplace needs. I recently talked to a pastor who was berated by a church member because he didn’t visit her when she had a simple outpatient procedure. And if I told you the procedure, you would understand that it would have been awkward for him to be there anyway.
  5. Counseling versus referral. Most pastors and church staff are not trained in counseling. But many church members want their pastor to provide counseling in a multiplicity of areas. It is often best to refer the church member to someone better equipped to handle the situation, but not all church members receive that direction well.
  6. Spending time with church members versus spending time with non-Christians. Both are necessary, but pastors and staff have limited time and they must choose how to balance ministry to Christians with incarnational presence with non-Christians.
  7. Local church ministry versus other ministries. Many pastors and staff are urged to be involved in denominational work, interchurch ministries, parachurch ministries, and mission endeavors. All may be worthy. All demand choices.
  8. Being prophetic versus being positive. On the one extreme is the pastor who is always proclaiming what is wrong with the world and culture. On the other extreme is the pastor who only wants to offer encouragement and hope and not address sin for what it is. The difficulty is finding the right balance.
  9. Long-term perspective versus short-term perspective. The types of decisions pastors and church staff must make are shaped by their own perspectives of their tenure at the church. It is not unusual for pastors to have uncertainty about their future at the church when they must make a decision that could have long-term implications.

The New Age of being Younger when you are Older

Below you'll see a photograph of my mother (center) with her brother and sister.  They are 80, 82 and 84.

In many ways, these three are my heroes. 

If you follow this blog with any regularity, you are aware of my recent efforts to take back my health.  On December 16, I experienced a bit of a conversion.  I read the book, Younger Next Year, and began a regular commitment to exercise 6 days a week, and stop eating crap.  I woke up today, March 11, 2015, and weighed myself.  I came in at 225.6 lbs.  I've lost 20 pounds off my peak last fall, I feel much better, sleep better, and am looking forward to a longer life.

While there are no guarantees in life, the fact of the matter is that people who eat well and exercise regularly live longer and healthier lives.  My mother, aunt and uncle are examples.  They are all in their early 80's, and enjoying life.  Yes, they each have had and have their ailments.  But, they are each living in their own homes, still drive, have social lives, purpose, etc.  How did they get here?  They have had active lifestyles for their entire lives.  Despite the fact that their parents were not interested in sports, they each embraced athletics - swimming, volleyball, golf, tennis, hiking, skiing.  Today, the exercise is more modest for each of them, but they continue to move their bodies everyday.

So, this is a toast to all those young older people in our society.  If we all want to join them, it would be worthwhile to get off the couch and start moving.

Christian Century

I found this nice article about classmate Ruben Duran, and the work he has done in the ELCA starting new ministry.  When people ask me, "what does Mission Support do?", well here is an example.

Shut up and learn

At a meeting of ecumenical leaders working on church planting and evangelism, I noticed that the room collectively leaned in and listened carefully whenever the moderator spoke. He was Ruben Duran, the program director for new congregations in the Evan­gelical Lutheran Church in America.

Under Duran’s leadership, the ELCA has started an impressive array of worshiping communities in homes and bars and on the streets and in train stations. These communities have found different entry points into conversations with their neighbors, gathering around ecological issues, or concerns about paycheck lending, or the need for day care. The Denver area alone has eight new ELCA communities, and nationally 352 new communities are being developed.

The burgeoning ministries are ethnically diverse. Though the ELCA has strong ties to people of European ancestry—especially Norwegians, Swedes, Germans, and Finns—Duran reports that people of color lead 56 percent of the new communities. Instead of reflecting the established de­nomination, these communities look like the neighborhoods in which they are planted.

When I telephoned Duran to find out how the denomination is doing so much, he was hesitant—as most church planters are—to talk about strategy, and he quickly dismissed the idea that he himself is a moving force in what is happening.

“There are no formulas. It’s about listening and connecting.” Then, like most people who are really good at starting new churches, Duran began to explain his strategy, describing how the ELCA works to connect neighborhoods, denominations, and seminaries.

“Luther says we live in and through our neighbor,” Duran explains. “Most of our congregations were planted for the neighborhood.” But when neighborhoods changed, congregations often resisted trans­formation. Members be­gan commuting to attend church. Then, Duran said, “the neighbors became the object of the church’s ministry rather than the subject.” Duran wants the neighbors to be the subject again.

The church’s strategy is to “shut up and learn”—to listen and reconnect with diverse neighborhoods, in­cluding the working poor and young adults who grew up in the suburbs but are now relocating in cities. “There are so many people in our neighborhoods who are doing God’s work,” Duran said, “but they just don’t know it yet.”

The ELCA has set up a process by which men and women who have the gifts and skills for ministry but who haven’t attended seminary can be full-time pastors—“lay mission developers”—serving with the blessing of the community and the bishop.

Duran has also worked with his own alma mater, Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary, to set up Theo­logical Education for Emerg­ing Ministries. The TEEM program allows students to take classes on campus two times a year and learn with a pastoral mentor while they remain in ministry. The program has 140 students.

“Seminaries are shifting very quickly,” Duran said, as he described online courses that allow students to stay rooted in the communities they serve.

Duran points to a story in Acts 6 about the early church that inspires his work. When Greek widows saw that church leaders were giving Jewish widows more food than they gave to the Greek widows, they organized and pointed out the unfair treatment. The disciples responded by handing over the work to the community.

“That’s what we’re doing,” Duran said. “We are getting people from the community to do that type of work. We are looking for the Greek widows.”

A great deal of the ELCA’s work has been fo­cused on urban areas. While the movement of young adults into the city certainly makes this emphasis important, I wonder what can be done in suburban and rural areas, especially as some minorities are moving to the suburbs in response to urban gentrification.

Duran’s energy seems boundless, but he admits to being overwhelmed. I cannot tell if this sort of work could be done without such charismatic leadership. Duran has great humility, even as he understands his unique position. “I’m very blessed that I’m able to test the waters. We have become a laboratory of ministry exploration.”

“The Book of Acts was named incorrectly,” Duran said. “It was the Acts of the Apostles, but it should have been named the Acts of the Holy Spirit. And right now, the Holy Spirit is writing a new chapter in Acts.”

An earlier version of this article included that there were 48 new communities in Denver; the number was corrected on February 24, 2015.

Guest Blogger - Pr. Jon Heydenreich

Did you see this article by New England Synod's Jon Heydenreich?


An Eating Plan, a Bike, and Old Spice: The Sequel

In this update to Pastor Jon Heydenreich's 2014 Wellness Voice, Jon faced his fear of biking up long hills and entered one of the toughest hillclimbs in the world. Jon says that without the initial push from Portico, his weight loss, and his increased exercise routine, "none of this would have happened."


Pastor Jon Heydenreich

Andover, Massachusetts
January 2015

In 2013, I lost over 50 pounds by changing the way I ate — whole foods, nothing with a face, limited oil, limited fat, and no dairy. My cholesterol level dropped from 225 to 139. I also ramped up my cycling to about 6,000 miles that year.

In 2014, I continued the eating plan, although less diligently — probably 70-80%. My weight had peaked around 255. By 2014, I dropped as low as 185 but usually stayed in the 190s. I cycled another 6,000 miles.

The major news was in cycling. For years I was afraid to cycle up long hills. Many times I could not manage. They were too much for me — and they were just hills! So in 2014, I entered some mountain races here in New England. The big race was the Mount Washington Auto Road Bicycle Hillclimb, known as one of the hardest hillclimbs in the world. The race is 7.6 miles at an average pitch of 12%, and sections at 18% and 22%.

My goal was to finish without stopping. I trained from March through August — an arduous process. But I didn’t train for the race-day weather: It was a pleasant 60 degrees at the start, but we had 30-50 mph winds, and a windchill of 32 degrees for some portions of the race. Some cyclists were actually being blown over by the gusts!

Of 630 entrants, 510 finished. I was one of the 55 finishers over the age of 58, and one of 60 "Clydesdales" (over 190 pounds) to finish. Needless to write, I was in the bottom 10%, but it was a wonderful blessing given where I had been just two years earlier. Without the weight loss and the push, push from Portico, none of this would have happened.

My mantra is that God has blessed us with potential far greater than we realize. In August 2015, you will find me with the old "fat" (for a cyclist!) guys at the starting line on Mount Washington, aiming to go a half hour faster. You go when you can… 

Here's Jon climbing the mountain.

Guest Blogger Today- Bp Nick Knisely

My colleague and friend, Bishop Nick Knisely of the Episcopal Diocese of Rhode Island, authored this fine column on his blog.


To not be provoked to evil

I’m waking to the news that there’s been a mass execution of Coptic Christians in Libya this morning by masked men who claim affiliation with the Islamic State movement. The victims died with the words “Jesus is Lord” on their lips. Violent actions like these, shared widely in an intentional media campaign, are carefully calculated to provoke a response in the rest of world, to bring about a world wide religious war.

And here in America, in some isolated incidents, it might be having the desired effect. The details are still sketchy as to the motivation of the shooter, but last week three of the shining lights of the American muslim community were murdered in Chapel Hill North Carolina by a professed anti-theist. (Not an atheist in the strict sense of the word — someone who doesn’t believe in God, but a person who actively rejects those who do believe. It’s a relatively new phenomenon in the US apparently.)

In West Warwick Rhode Island yesterday, disturbing vandalism against a local Islamic school has brought the conflict to our community.

A day after holding a vigil for three Muslim students killed in North Carolina, the Islamic School of Rhode Island was vandalized.

Some time Saturday night racial slurs were spray-painted over the entrance of the school that serves students in pre-kindergarten through eighth grade, school officials said.

Orange paint covered the school’s doors with the words, “Now this is a hate crime” and “pigs,” among other expletives referencing the prophet Muhammad.

The irony is, such actions, if they are meant to be some sort of retaliation, are exactly what the violent actions in Syria, Iraq and now Libya are meant to provoke.

Jesus taught us that the great commandment was to love God above all else. And then he told us we could do that in a practical way by willing to love our neighbor as ourselves. Any thing else leads us away from God and into the realm of violence and death.

It will take a great deal of spiritual discipline to not be drawn into the whirlwind of violence which is the dream of those who have done such killings.

Will you join me in praying that God will grant us the courage and the will to resist? Pray that we focus on doing what we can to make our community stronger, to live into what America was founded to be, a place where freedom of religion was intended to put an end to religious violence of all forms.

It seems appropriate, on this President’s Day in 2015 to make the following prayer:

“O Judge of all the nations, we remember before you with grateful hearts the men and women of our country who in the day of decision ventured much for the liberties we now enjoy. Grant that we may not rest until all the people of this land share the benefits of true freedom and gladly accept its disciplines. This we ask in the Name of Jesus Christ our Lord.” (Book of Common Prayer, p. 839)

Amen.

Time is on God's side, ...Yes it is!

The good folks over at Holy Cow Consulting put out a monthly e-newsletter.  It often has some helpful thinking.  I share this one with you.  More information at www.holycowconsulting.com 

Organizational Intelligence and Saving the Precious Commodity of Time

by Emily C

2079960b97301271e7872ccda5be2072A transformational regional association is one that has focused on creating vital, growing congregations and is discovering effective ways of achieving that vision.  One of the obstacles to this vision that is frequently mentioned is finding the time required for regional association staff and volunteers from local churches to undertake the work involved in that enterprise. In this article, I explore the four ways that OI addresses the time issue.

Time Saver #1: Abandoning Failure Paths

Anyone who has ever undertaken a road trip has first hand experience with the relationship between information and time. Maps, a graphic form of information, save time by eliminating failure paths, that is, routes that do not lead to the destination.

If the destination is vital, growing churches, organizational intelligence can help identify the paths that will not get us there. I will not present a comprehensive list of well-documented failure paths here. Instead, I will focus on one: low missional flexibility. I define missional flexibility as “the capacity of a church as a whole to make changes that are necessary to effectively fulfill its mission in a particular context without investing large amounts of internal energy managing conflict.” With rare exceptions, churches with low missional flexibility indicate the desire to grow, but do not have adequate flexibility to accommodate their aspirations.

Churches with low missional flexibility will stagnate and decline regardless of the financial resources that are invested in their renewal. This is also true of less tangible resources including the time and energy of a regional association staff. No amount of coaching, training, or facilitation can compensate for a lack of missional flexibility. For this reason, regional associations should direct their energy toward congregations that are more adaptive and move inflexible congregations to the bottom of their list. Organizational intelligence provides the information that enables leaders to make these kinds of tough decisions.  The result is a more productive use of time.

Time Saver #2: Closing Black Hole Conversations 

Black hole conversations occur when individuals seek to monopolize the time of a leader by advocating a perspective that is not fact-based. When I was a pastor, I could count on an annual visit of the president of the women’s association complaining that younger women were not supporting their work by attending their (daytime) meetings. Finally, I did a little research. In a church with 800 members, only four “younger” women did not work daytime jobs. That ended the long series of (black hole) conversations.

In a healthy congregation, about 70% of members are going to be satisfied. Even so, 3% of the members are still going to be dissatisfied. For churches in crisis, 20% of the members may be dissatisfied. Even in the strongest of churches, 10% of members indicate there is a disturbing level of conflict. This means that complaints to regional association leaders are inevitable. A phone call from a disgruntled member of a vital congregation may be just as intense and time-consuming as a phone call from a disgruntled member of a church in crisis, but the two require very different responses. One is a black hole conversation that needs to be closed and the other is a crisis that requires an intervention. How does a regional association leader know which is which?

Organizational intelligence provides the information that enables leaders to do a better job distinguishing one from the other. By pulling up the Vital Signs report on the screen in real time while talking with a church member, the leader can place the conversation into a factual context. In some cases, this enables the leader to shift the conversation in a pastoral direction, which will likely be more fruitful. In other cases, it will enable the leader to know what conversations can be abbreviated or spaced, all with a good measure of integrity. That not only saves time, it reduces stress.

Time Saver #3: Focusing on Motivated Moments

Local church leaders are often oblivious to the activities of regional associations, and church members even less so. Regional association leaders often spend a lot of time trying to market programs to local churches and are frequently frustrated by the lack of response. Marketing regional association offerings that are unaligned with the priorities of local church leaders absorbs an inordinate amount of time.

For example, stewardship programs are often a major focus of regional associations in spite of the fact that organizational intelligence consistently indicates that stewardship is a relatively low priority to local church leaders, far behind priorities related to church growth, disciple-making, and creating vital congregations. Getting focused in areas where congregations are motivated saves time otherwise wasted on a small number of people. Organizational intelligence can save time by identifying those priorities.

The greater time-saver of organizational intelligence is in creating motivated moments when churches are asking for a connection to the regional association that require no marketing at all. When local church leaders review their organizational intelligence, they inevitably turn to the regional association representative (assuming he/she is in the room) and ask for help. If regional association leaders were simply present to local church leaders as they review their organizational intelligence, they could probably eliminate half their marketing budget and save all the time they invest in trying to get people to come to events.

Time Saver #4: Moving from Interventions to Interactions

Churches in crisis require climate-based interventions. I define a climate-based intervention as process in which a regional association must step into a local church to deal with a crisis situation where the morale has deteriorated to the point that the church is now in a recovery mode. (I distinguish this from a conduct-based intervention where allegations have been made against a leader.) As any regional association leader can testify, interventions are stressful and time-consuming.

In contract to churches in crisis are churches in descent. Churches in descent require an interaction. I define an interaction as a purposeful conversation among local church and regional association leaders. Interactions address issues before they reach the crisis level. For example, a healthy church that calls a pastor will rarely go into crisis in the first year of the new pastorate. However, there can be a significant erosion in energy and satisfaction, a trend, if sustained, is likely to lead to a crisis within five years. Interactions with churches in descent are much less stressful, are more likely to have positive outcomes, but also require far less time.

Churches in crisis are relatively easy to spot but hard to treat. Churches in descent is easier to treat, but harder to spot. For that reason, regional associations usually do not become engaged until churches reach the crisis level and require a time consuming intervention.

Organizational intelligence, when gathered systematically over time, can reverse this pattern. Regional association leaders can begin to spot churches in descent when purposeful conversations (interactions) are more like to have a positive outcome which preserves the vitality of the church, the esteem of the leader, and, most importantly for this article, saves time for the regional association leader.

A Conversion on Health and Wellness

I am not sure why it clicked this time, but it did.

On December 19th I was at the gym I belong to in Wakefield, RI.  It's called Riverbend.  It's a simple gym, with lots of mid-age and older people, and a smattering of young URI students to make the rest of us envious of the days when we all had 5% body fat.  On this December day, I got talking with a guy in the locker room.  This is unusual, because typically I enjoy my anonymity.  As we talked he told me about a book he’d read called, Younger Next Year.  Sounded good, I bought it, read it and then bought the follow up book, Thinner This Year.

The message of the book is basically, exercise everyday and don’t eat crap.  We’ve all heard this message before.  We all know we should…. but we don’t.  Why it hit me this time, I have no idea?  Perhaps it was seeing so many people lately who are overweight, eating bad food, others who are frail.  Maybe it was news that I’m going to be a grandfather next summer.  Maybe it was hitting my mid 50’s and starting to feel a few more aches and pains.  Maybe it was the pounding messages from Portico, my health care provider.  Maybe it was the annual physical where the doctor said, “you know Jim, and you could…” I’m not sure what it was, but I made a decision this past Christmas, that I was going to give a gift to myself, my family, my friends, and yes, even a return thanksgiving to the Spirit of God.  That was a decision to get healthy, not just pretend healthy like I’d done for years.  Easy stuff at the gym, you know just enough to say, ok that’s enough, then stop a Starbucks for a Cookie and a Mocha Frap with Whip Cream and Chocolate drizzle.

So, I’ve been at it for five weeks now, going on six.  I’m exercising hard every day, ok, at least six days a week.  I mean exercise till my t-shirt is soaking wet. Real exercise.  The Thinner this Year, book has a great exercise plan for strength training as well.  You can do it without a gym. My knees are shot from basketball and years as a 6’7” guy, so running is not an option.  But, I’m walking on those treadmills or out on a country road.

I’m also done eating crap.  Sorry coffee hour folks at churches.  No more cake and cookies.  Put out that fruit tray and I’m all over it.  I’m focusing on fruits and vegetables, along with fish.  Yes, I’ll have some chicken, but no more red meat.  OK, I lied, I had meat in the Lasagna last week, but now that’s the exception not the norm.


What difference does it make?

I’ve lost 4 lbs.; my goal is to get down 20 lbs. by summer.  That’s a pound a week.  That’s doable at this current pace. I clearly have more strength in my legs. As my quads have strengthened my knee joint pain has reduced.  Wow, stairs are not a problem for me.  In only 6 weeks!

Best of all, I’m sleeping solid every night.  I don’t crave snacks in between meals – when I do, I drink water.  I’m also feeling better from head to toe.

Yes, I got a cold like everyone else in the middle of this new routine, but I blew through that pretty quick.

So this post is a note of encouragement.  Read the book; learn why this is so essential, especially for people age 50 and up.

Yes, I’m a bit of a convert, a zealot if you will.  For me it’s all connected to a whole life stewardship that includes a healthy body and soul, a healthy attitude of thanksgiving and generosity and a sense of purpose in this crazy mixed up world.

Here's that nudge of encouragement.  You'll thank yourself, and you'll thank God.


Marcus Borg

Marcus Borg passed away this week.  While I did not agree with everything he wrote, he was an influential scholar of the life of the historical Jesus.  He challenged contemporary people to have what he called an "adult faith"  He wanted us to make full use of the tools of modern scholarship, and still hold to an expansive faith.  It was and is a delicate balance that requires a thoughtful and consistent exploration and re-exploration of what is essential for a believing person.

This article is reprinted from http://www.ministrymatters.com

(RNS) Marcus J. Borg, a prominent liberal theologian and Bible scholar who for a generation helped shaped the intense debates about the historical Jesus and the veracity and meaning of the New Testament, died on Wednesday (Jan. 21). He was 72 and had been suffering from a prolonged illness, friends said.

Borg emerged as a major voice in biblical studies in the 1980s just as academics and theologians were bringing new energy to the so-called “quest for the historical Jesus,” the centuries-old effort to disentangle fact from myth in the Gospels.

Alongside scholars such as John Dominic Crossan, Borg was a leader in the Jesus Seminar, which brought a skeptical eye to the Scriptures and in particular to supernatural claims about Jesus’ miracles and his resurrection from the dead.

Like many of those critical scholars, Borg tended to view Jesus as a Jewish prophet and teacher, like many figures who emerged from the religious ferment of first-century Judaism.

But while Borg questioned the Bible,, he never lost his passion for the spiritual life or his faith in God as “real and a mystery,” as he put it in his 2014 memoir, “Convictions: How I Learned What Matters Most,” the last of more than 20 books he wrote, many of which helped popularize scholarship about the historical Jesus among lay Christians.

“Imagine that Christianity is about loving God. Imagine that it’s not about the self and its concerns, about ‘what’s in it for me,’ whether that be a blessed afterlife or prosperity in this life,” Borg wrote.

Marcus Borg was the youngest of four children, born March 11, 1942 in North Dakota and raised in a traditional Lutheran family. He attended Concordia College in Minnesota where he majored in philosophy and political science.

He remained fascinated by the New Testament, however, and accepted a fellowship to do graduate work at Union Seminary in New York City, where he delved deeply into the Jewish background of the Gospels and Jesus of Nazareth and studied with some of the major liberal theologians teachings there. Borg then went on to further studies at Oxford and taught at various Midwest universities on his return to the U.S.

In 1979 he joined the faculty at Oregon State University and taught religion there until his retirement in 2007.

Borg’s 1987 book, “Jesus: A New Vision,” launched him to prominence. The book summarized and explained recent New Testament scholarship for a popular audience while presenting Jesus as a social and political prophet of his time and place who was driven by his relationship with God – a relational approach that Borg saw as more important than traditional Christian beliefs based on a literal reading of the Bible.

In subsequent books, three of them co-written with Crossan, Borg continued to press and expand on those ideas, becoming a hero to Christian progressives and a target for conservatives.

Borg himself loved to debate but was no polemicist, and over the years maintained strong friendships with those who disagreed with him, developing a reputation as a gracious and generous scholar in a field and a profession that are not always known for those qualities.

For example, Borg co-authored a 1999 book, “The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions,” with N.T. Wright, an Anglican bible scholar who took a more orthodox view of the Gospels. But Wright also recommended many of Borg’s books and lectured alongside him on occasion.

“Spanning the study of Jesus and a wide variety of subjects, Marcus shaped the conversation about Jesus, the church, and Scripture in powerful ways over the space of four decades,” Frederick W. Schmidt, Jr., of Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary, wrote on his blog on hearing of Borg’s passing.

“I came to different conclusions about a number of issues, but Marc was always incisive, tenacious, thoughtful, and unfailingly gracious; and over the years he became a cherished friend,” Schmidt wrote.

The Rev. Barkley Thompson, an Episcopal priest and rector of Christ Church Cathedral in Houston, Texas, broke the news of Borg’s death in a blog post in which he spoke of how much he had learned from Borg and how close they remained even as Thompson’s beliefs became more traditional and veered away from Borg’s.

“I once introduced Marcus to a church audience by saying, ‘I agree with roughly 75 percent of what Marcus will say to you this evening,’” Thompson wrote in his tribute. “When he stepped into the pulpit, Marcus quipped, ‘I’m tempted to forego my notes and discuss with Barkley the other 25 percent!’”

During a question-and-answer period with parishioners at one event someone asked Borg, “But how do you know that you’re right?”

Borg paused and responded: “I don’t know. I don’t know that I’m right.”

Thompson said he had corresponded with Borg in late November and asked how he was doing.

“I may have ten years left,” Borg wrote back. “Not sure I want more. There comes a time to let go. And I could, with gratitude, sooner than that. My life has been very blessed.”

Funeral arrangements were not immediately available. While raised a Lutheran, Borg gravitated to the Episcopal Church, which was his home for much of his life. His wife, Marianne, is an Episcopal priest and canon at Trinity Episcopal Cathedral in Portland, Oregon, where Borg frequently lectured and was given the title of canon theologian.

With characteristic humor he said his wife informed him that “canon” means “big shot.”

A visit to All Souls Church, and 4 Key Learnings

Over the first weekend in January, Lisa and I traveled to Washington, DC to visit our son and daughter-in-law.  Aside from the great meals and conversations, we also joined them for Sunday worship at a church they attend periodically.  The congregation is All Souls Church near the Adams Morgan neighborhood.  What follows are some brief observations of what it’s like to attend a church of another tradition. 

-       Parking was a bit of pain, as you have to park on the street. No parking lot.  We normally take mass transit in the cities we visit, but several factors made us drive including the need to drive out to the burbs for an afternoon visit with my brother and his family.

-       It was easy to find the entrance, and despite the cool drizzly weather there were people outside greeting us.  They had name tags and a smile, “welcome to All Souls.”  They were expecting guests.  Does your church?

-       Once inside someone handed me a bulletin, and said “sit wherever you like.”  This was important, cause I’ve never been to a Unitarian church.  Did they have special rules regarding who sits where?

-       I sat about 2/3 of the way back, cause it was filling up fast and I needed to save four seats together.

-       The church filled between 11:10 and 11:25, with worship beginning at 11:15.  There were many people of a wide range of ages.  It was mostly white, with about 10-15% African American, and there were many same gender couples.

-       Worship was vibrant, a great mix of music, with hymns that were easy to sing.  “Hush, Hush, Somebody’s callin’ my name”  “Morning has Broken”  “We are marching in the Light of God” and a gospel version of “This Little light of Mine”  The fact that the songs/hymns were easy to sing was very important to me as a non-musician.  I’ve been to churches where no one knows the songs, and we all just mumble through.  In contrast, everyone sang and this brought energy to the place.

-       There choir anthems were much more intricate and sophisticated, and they were well done – really well done.  There were 3, and they ranged in musical styles from classical to jazz to gospel/rock.  Apparently, sometimes they do opera pieces.

-       There was a hokey children’s sermon, but then again, I’ve yet to see or give a children’s sermon that I liked.

-       The sermon was well done with both biblical references to Miriam as well as contemporary authors and poets.  The theme was around this new year and a chance for each of us to Sing a New Song in our lives. 

-       Since it was a Unitarian worship, we did not have Holy Communion, and there was minimal, if any reference to Jesus.  It was a worship service focused on a broadly defined understanding of God.

-       I left energized and inspired.  The community was welcoming, and if I was a newcomer looking for a faith community, I’d probably go back.  As a theologian, were there pieces I would have hoped for, of course.  But I was not there to evaluate and judge, I was there to enter into the experience.  I was rewarded.

 

All Souls has clearly carved out it’s mission as the liberal social justice church.  They make no bones about it.  They don’t apologize for who they are and what they are focused on – rally’s for an affordable housing project, a film group going to see “Selma”, an LGBTQ emphasis.  They know who they are, and people embrace it.

 

What can we learn from this experience that can be applied to our churches?

 

1.     Be intentional about welcoming people.  Have greeters outside with name tags.

2.     Make music accessible for people who don’t sing much, and use your choir/band/specialists for the more sophisticated pieces.

3.     Know who you are.  Don’t copy All Souls or any other church.  Carve out your own identity and make it clear.

4.     Notice the outward or externally focused nature of this congregation.  They are committed to serving their community, their context.  Once again, I’ve said it a million times, “Externally focused churches have a future. Inward, self-serving, we are here for our people churches have a very short lifespan.”

Today's Quote from Ed Friedman

"More thinking about the problem doesn't solve the problem...You have to have adventure...Move protoplasm through space in order to get new perceptions...The imaginative capacity changes systems."

Dr. Edwin Friedman

 

Dr. Friedman was a rabbi, and family system thinker and therapist.  He is the author of A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix  That's a book I only recommend to people if they are live, if you are dead, you can pass.

The Wisdom of Carey Nieuwhof on Small & Mid-Size Churches

I really appreciate Carey Nieuwhof's blog.  Do you know it?

Here is his latest post on small and medium size churches:

5 Tensions Every Small & Mid-Size Church Encounters

A recent post I did on why most churches never break the 200 attendance mark really seems to have struck a nerve.

tensions small church faces

People clearly have strong opinions and emotions about the size of churches.

When I began in ministry, I spent about 3 years leading a small congregation (under 100) that grew into a mid-sized church (under 500) and then grew into a larger church.

I remember the emotions that swirl around small and mid-sized churches. I also have lived through the tensions those congregations face.

This post (like the last one) is for church leaders and teams that want to reach more people.

It’s critical that as church leaders we understand the tensions we’re facing. In the same way that diagnosing that pain under your kneecap when you’re trying to run a race is helpful, diagnosing what you feel in the congregation can be critical to taking your next step forward.

Overcome these tensions and you’re closer to progress. Avoid them or fail to deal with them and you can stay stuck a long time.

So, here are 5 tensions every small and mid-sized church encounters:

1. The desire to keep the church one big family. This pressure is huge. People believe that the church functions best as one big family.  The reality is even when our church was 40 people, those 40 people didn’t know each other—really. Some were left out, others weren’t. Even at 100 or 300, enough people will still believe they know ‘everyone’. But they don’t. When people told me they knew everyone I would challenge people (nicely) and say “Really, you know everyone? Because as much as I wished I did, I don’t.” They would then admit they didn’t know everyone. They just knew the people they knew and liked and often felt that growing the church would threaten that.

The truth is, at 100-300, many people are unknown. And even if ‘we all wear name-tags”, many of the people in your church don’t really have anyone to talk to about what matters. The one big family idea is, in almost every case, a myth.

Once you get beyond a dozen people, start organizing in groups. Everyone will have a home. Everyone who wants to be known and have meaningful relationships will have them. And a healthy groups model is scalable to hundred, thousands and even beyond that.

2. The people who hold positions don’t always hold the power. This is a tension almost every small to mid-sized church faces. Your board may be your board, but often there are people, and even families, whose opinion carries tremendous weight.  If one of those people sits on the board, they end up with a de facto veto because no one wants to make a move without their buy in. If they are not on the board, decisions the board makes or a leader makes can get ‘undone’ if the person or family disapproves.

This misuse of power is unhealthy and needs to be stopped. In the churches where I began, I took the power away from these people by going head to head with them, then handed it back to the people who are supposed to have the power. In two out of three cases, the person left the church after it was clear I would not allow them to run it anymore. It’s a tough call, but the church was far healthier for it. The people who were supposed to lead got to lead. And we grew.

3. The pastor carries expectations no one can live up to. In most small to mid sized churches, the pastor is expected to never miss a wedding, funeral, hospital call or meeting, visit people in their homes, write a killer message every Sunday and organize most of the activities of the church and be present for all functions AND have a great family life.

The key here for those who want to grow past this is to set clear expectations of what you will spend your time on. I visited for the first two years and when we went to a groups model, explained (for what seemed like forever) how care was shifting from me to the congregation. I stopped attending every church event. We have a great counseling referral network. And I started focusing on what I can best contribute given my gift set: communication, charting a course for the future, developing our best leaders, casting vision and raising resources.

4. Tradition has more pull than vision.  This is not just about traditional churches—it’s true of church plants too. The past has a nostalgia to it that the future never does. Even the recent past. Remember how great the church felt when it was smaller, more intimate and met in the living room/school/old facility?

The challenge for the leader is to cast a vision that is clear enough and compelling enough to pull people from the familiar past into a brighter future.

5. The desire to do more, not less. As you grow, you will be tempted to do more. Every time there are more people/money/resources, the pressure will be strong to add programming and complexity to your organization.

Resist that. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should. Often the key to reaching more is doing less. By doing a few things well and creating steps, not programs, you will help more people grow faster than almost any other way. The two books that have helped me see this more than any other resources are Andy Stanley, Lane Jones and Reggie Joiner’s Seven Practices of Effective Ministry and Thom Rainer and Eric Geiger’s Simple Church. These two books helped our team resist the pressure to do more simply because we could.

Often complexity is the enemy of progress.

What tensions do you face or have you faced in small to mid-sized churches?

How are you handling them? Leave a comment.

Ideas on Preaching

I'm reposting this article from Pastors.com, cause I think there is good material in here for anyone doing public speaking.

Five Ways to Improve Congregational Engagement 

By Brandon Hilgemann

AudienceIs your audience boring?

Do they respond to your preaching? Do they laugh at jokes? Do they say “Amen.” Do they ever clap their hands? Are they leaning in to listen? Are they taking notes?

You may think the problem is your people, but I want to propose something different here: If your audience is dull, maybe the problem isn’t your audience. Maybe, the problem is how you have engaged with them.

Audience engagement starts with the speaker. People will do what they are taught., Many pastors just don’t encourage engagement.

In my opinion, good preaching sits somewhere in between monologue and dialogue (a lecture and a conversation). The preacher does the talking, but the audience is engaged and gives feedback with their body language and occasional with their mouths.

So how do you help build audience engagement? Here are five ways I have found helpful.

But first, I need to make 3 important disclaimers:

  1. Just because people says “Amen” or clap a lot  doesn’t make you a better preacher. There is such a thing as too much engagement. 
  2. Audience engagement will vary by church tradition. I am not saying that any one tradition is better than another. This advice is only if you want to encourage more engagement from a dull or difficult crowd.
  3. There is no better way to engage an audience than a great message. All the tips below on a bad sermon are wasted. If your content is bad, boring, or unbiblical, this advice won’t help. 

1. Ask questions

When you only speak at people, they will either tune you out or only listen. By asking questions (even though they are often rhetorical), you engage people’s minds and invite them to think for themselves instead of letting you do all the thinking for them.

Questions invite people to participate in the sermon. Questions ask people to think with you.

Don’t just tell people the truth; Lead them to discovering the truth themselves by asking questions and getting them thinking.

2. Tell them how to respond

If you want people to respond a certain way to your sermon, tell them to. This may feel strange at first, but people will do what they are asked to do.

Here are a few examples:

  • “Raise your hands if…”
  • “Amen?”
  • “Nod your head if you agree that…”
  • “Tell the person next to you…”
  • “Look at this…”
  • “Give a round of applause for…”
  • “Look at me, because this is important…”
  • “Stand up if…”
  • “Repeat after me…”

People will do what you ask them to do. Be clear about what you want them to do and they will do it.

3. Use Visual Illustrations

Give people something to look at.

People are visual beings. Visuals catch our eyes and engage our brains.

We could all learn a valuable lesson from kindergarten, you have to show and tell.

Many pastors just tell.

Turn analogies and metaphors into visual illustrations.

If you have a major point you are trying to get across, ask yourself, “How can I show and tell this?”

This may not work in every message, but I guarantee people will be better engaged when it does.

4. Add Humor

Humor immediately draws people in. It also disarms a tough crowd.

Laughter creates engagement. You cannot laugh at something and not be engaged. It’s impossible.

Laughter is also contagious. Have you ever noticed that watching a funny movie is always better with a crowd? We feed off the laughter of others.

Warning: This doesn’t mean tell a bunch of corny preacher jokes that you find on the internet. It means use your natural sense of humor when appropriate.

5. Tell Stories

We love stories. We live in one of the most story-centered cultures of all time. Movies, TV, books, talk shows, music, magazines… all of them tell stories.

People naturally engage with good stories.

If your audience is drifting, tell a good story and they will immediately snap back.

I often find that people will actually remember stories I tell years later, even after they have long forgotten the sermons.

I even hear Jesus told a story or two himself. There just may be something to this.

How do you help your audience engagement with your sermons?